Live
- Kanguva’s Box Office Disaster: Is This the End of Suriya’s Mega Hit?
- Maoist killed, jawan injured in encounter
- Kerala Police Officer Brutally Murdered By Estranged Husband In Tragic Domestic Violence Case
- Pallishree Mela records good sales at Bali Jatra
- Kharif paddy purchase begins in Bargarh
- Faeces forced into tribal woman’s mouth
- Hyderabad's Air Quality Worsens as Winter Settles In | AQI Levels Reach Moderate Range
- Dead' Man Wakes Up En Route To Cremation In Rajasthan; Three Doctors Suspended
- Odisha to study root causes for migration of labourers
- Forest officials accountable for wildlife deaths: Minister
Anything can be hacked: Musk
Sweeping generalisation, counters BJP
New Delhi: After Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and former IT minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar claimed that Indian electronic voting machines (EVMs) are ‘secure’ and ‘isolated’ while responding to a statement on EVMs made by tech giant Elon Musk, the latter on Sunday rubbished Chandrasekhar’s claim. The virtual discussion started as Musk on Saturday said on X, “We should eliminate electronic voting machines.” He was reacting to a social media post by Independent US presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Junior on voting irregularities related to EVMs in Puerto Rico’s primary elections.
“The risk of being hacked by humans or AI, while small, is still too high,” the SpaceX, Tesla and X Corp owner added.
Meanwhile, in a detailed post on X, Chandrasekhar suggested that Musk was making “huge sweeping generalisation statement” adding that his “view may apply to US and other places – where they use regular compute platforms to build Internet connected voting machines”. “But Indian EVMs are custom designed, secure and isolated from any network or media – No connectivity, no Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Internet, ie, there is no way in,” Chandrasekhar added.
Replying to Chandrasekhar, Musk said, “Anything can be hacked.” Interestingly, the former minister agreed that “technically” Musk was right while reiterating that the conversation related to EVMs being secure and reliable is ‘different’.
“Technically ur (you are) right – anything is possible E.g..wth quantum compute, i can decrypt any level of encryption, with lab level tech n plenty of resources, i can hack any digital hardware/system incldng (including) flight controls of a glass cockpit of a jet etc etc. But thats a different type of a conversatn (conversation) from EVMs being secure n (and) reliable vis a vis paper voting. And we can agree to disagree,” Chandrasekhar wrote.
Notably, there were reports on the recently concluded Lok Sabha polls stating that the Election Commission data from 543 parliamentary constituencies show that except for a few constituencies like Daman & Diu, Lakshadweep and Attingal in Kerala, the number of EVM votes counted differs from that of EVM votes polled.
