Live
- Roads blocked with containers, army called in as Pakistan seals capital Islamabad ahead of PTI protest
- ISL 2024-25: NorthEast United forward Alaaeddine Ajaraie named Player of the Month
- MahaYuti’s landslide win a major boost to make Maharashtra a $1 trillion economy
- Regional parties will continue to be future of Indian politics, says BRS
- Most Americans not aware that alcohol ups cancer risk: Survey
- Bengal bypolls: Trinamool Congress sweeps up all six Assembly constituencies, Mamata thanks voters (4th Lead)
- BJP wins five Rajasthan bypolls seats, Congress one
- VHP's 'Sant Samavesh' discusses Waqf issue, religious conversions, autonomy for temples
- Famous Chinar boat race organised in J&K's Dal Lake
- Entire Maharashtra behind PM Modi: Devendra Fadnavis
SC asks Swamy to wait on his plea
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked BJP leader Subramanian Swamy to wait for 10 days for a direction to the Centre to clear its stand on giving national heritage status to the mythological Ram Sethu
Giving Ram Sethu national heritage status
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked BJP leader Subramanian Swamy to wait for 10 days for a direction to the Centre to clear its stand on giving national heritage status to the mythological 'Ram Sethu'.
Ram Sethu or the Adam's bridge is a chain of limestone shoals between Pamban or Rameswaram Island off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu and Mannar Island on the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.
Swamy told a bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud that even after the apex court’s direction, the Centre has not filed an affidavit on the issue of Ram Sethu.
He said the court had issued a notice to the Centre on the matter but even after 10 years, it has not responded on the issue. "You wait for another 10 days. Then come again," the bench said.
Swamy had in March this year announced that he would be moving the top court to direct the Centre to declare Ram Sethu as a national heritage monument.
The BJP leader had earlier raised the issue of declaring Ram Sethu as national monument in his PIL against the controversial Sethusamudram Ship Channel project, initiated by the UPA-I government.
The matter had reached the apex court which in 2007 had stayed the work for the project on the Ram Sethu.
The Centre had later said that it considered the "socio-economic disadvantages" of the project and was willing to explore an alternative route to the shipping channel project without damaging the 'Ram Setu'.
"That the Government of India intends to explore an alternative to the earlier alignment of Sethusamudram Ship Channel project without affecting/damaging the Adam's Bridge/Ram Sethu in the interest of the nation," the affidavit filed by the ministry had said. The court had then asked the government to file a fresh affidavit.
In the Ramayana, the Rama Setu bridge was built by the 'Vanara army' to rescue Sita who was kidnapped by Ravana.
The Sethusamudram shipping channel project has been facing protests from some political parties, environmentalists and certain Hindu religious groups.
Under the project, an 83 km-long deep-water channel was to be created, linking Mannar with Palk Strait, by extensive dredging and removal of the limestone shoals.
The apex court had on November 13, 2017 granted six weeks to the Centre to clarify its stand on the Ram Sethu.
It had also granted liberty to Swamy to approach the court if the response of the Centre was not filed.
