Live
- COP29: Scientists, artists, faith leaders call for greater commitment to delivery of climate finance
- Woman donates liver to husband, saves life
- Mechanic Rocky Review: Thrilling Action Film with Twists and Great Performances
- Ponguleti Sudhakar Reddy rubbishes Rahul Gandhi's claims on Modi and Adani
- ‘We can’t take things for granted’: Jayasuriya on balancing formats and Sri Lanka’s path to WTC final
- Prakash Ambedkar ready to 'power' the winner in Maha polls - Mahayuti or MVA
- BJP plans campaign against Cong govt
- Be lifelines to public & render best, cops told
- Siri 2.0: Apple's Advanced AI Assistant to Be Released in 2026
- Senegal ruling party wins parliamentary majority: Provisional results
Just In
The Maharashtra polices move to arrest five wellknown activists was punctured on Wednesday with the Supreme Court observing that dissent is the safety valve of democracy and directing that those in its custody be kept under house arrest The five human rights activists Varavara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira, Sudha Bharadwaj and Gautam Navlakha who were arrested after the pan India c
​New Delhi/Pune: The Maharashtra police's move to arrest five well-known activists was punctured on Wednesday with the Supreme Court observing that "dissent is the safety valve of democracy" and directing that those in its custody be kept under house arrest. The five human rights activists — Varavara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira, Sudha Bharadwaj and Gautam Navlakha — who were arrested after the pan India crackdown on Tuesday will not be sent to jail but be under house arrest until September 6, the court ruled.
"Dissent is the safety valve of democracy and if you don't allow these safety valves it will burst," a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said. Dealing a blow to the Maharashtra police, the bench, also comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud, questioned it for arresting the activists nine months after the violence between Dalits and upper caste Peshwas in Koregaon-Bhima village near Pune following the Elgar Parishad, or conclave, on December 31, 2017.
Provocative speeches were made at the Elgar Parishad, which triggered the violence, according to an FIR registered in a Pune police station. The Pune police claimed that it had unearthed a "Maoist conspiracy hatched to overthrow the elected governments".
The alleged plot came to light after the police analysed the electronic devices, documents and other "highly incriminating evidences" seized from the arrested persons showing their links with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist), said Pune Deputy Commissioner of Police Shirish Sardeshpande.
The apex court also issued notice to the Maharashtra government and the state police on the plea by five leading intellectuals, including historian Romila Thapar and economists Prabhat Patnaik and Devaki Jain, against the arrests in connection with the case.
"The Supreme Court has passed an order that covers all who were arrested," said lawyer Vrinda Grover after the ruling. She added that they would be taken back to their homes. While trade unionist and lawyer Bharadwaj is confined to her home in Faridabad and civil liberties activist Navlakha to his Delhi residence, Telugu poet Rao and activists Gonsalves and Ferreira were taken to Pune late on Tuesday night.
They were arrested for their suspected links to Maoists following near simultaneous searches at Rao's home in Hyderabad, Gonzalves' and Ferreira's residences in Mumbai as well as in Faridabad and Delhi, officials said.
They were arrested under IPC Section 153(A), which relates to promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place or birth, residence, language and committing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony.
Some other sections of the IPC were also pressed, along with the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, for their "alleged Naxal activities", an official said, without elaborating.
As activists and others breathed a little easier following the apex court ruling, the Delhi High Court, which was hearing Navlakha's plea, observed that even if all other arrests were found to be valid, it would not lend validity to his arrest.
The National Human Rights Commission also stepped into the controversy, saying "it appears" standard operating procedure was not properly followed and this may amount to a violation of the human rights of those arrested. It issued notices to the Maharashtra government and the state's police chief and asked for a 'factual report' within four weeks.
As the courts gave their ruling in Delhi, police in Pune said it had "evidence" suggesting a plan to target the "highest political functionaries".
Joint Commissioner of Pune Police Shivajirao Bodkhe also claimed to have evidence to suggest that the arrested people had links with Kashmiri separatists. The Elgar Parishad, he told reporters, was funded by the Maoists.
Earlier in the day, Maharashtra minister of state for home Deepak Kesarkar said all procedures were followed before conducting the raids against the activists. "It is due to their links with Naxal movements that they have been arrested. If there was no evidence, we would not have taken the action," he said. The others whose premises were reportedly searched were Father Stan Swamy, Susan Abraham, Kranthi Tekula and Anand Teltumbde.
"The entire case is a political ploy against political dissent by this vindictive and cowardly government...," Navlakha said in a statement issued by civil rights group People's Union for Democratic Rights of which he is a part.
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com