Live
- Job scam: No High Court bail for Partha
- Joint teams from AP, TG destroy illicit liquor
- Refusing medical aid to sexual, acid attack survivors an offence
- TTD Parakamani Theft Case: Fresh row as board member seeks probe
- People struggling with rising prices: Rahul
- Santa cap on Annamayya statue sparks tension
- Speed up Bhogapuram airport works: CS to officials
- Demand up for Amit Shah’s dismissal
- APSFL sacks 410 staff with immediate effect
- Integrity of poll process eroding
Genuine mistake: Prashant Bhushan admits in SC for tweets on fabricated paper
Advocate Prashant Bhushan on Thursday admitted before the Supreme Court that he made a genuine mistake by tweeting that the government had perhaps submitted fabricated minutes of meeting of the highpowered selection committee on the appointment of M Nageswara Rao as an interim CBI director
Attorney General K K Venugopal told the bench that he would like to withdraw his contempt plea filed against Bhushan.
​New Delhi: Advocate Prashant Bhushan on Thursday admitted before the Supreme Court that he made a "genuine mistake" by tweeting that the government had perhaps submitted fabricated minutes of meeting of the high-powered selection committee on the appointment of M Nageswara Rao as an interim CBI director.
Attorney General K K Venugopal told a bench comprising justice Arun Mishra and Navin Sinha that in view of Bhushan's statement, he would like to withdraw his contempt plea filed against the noted lawyer.
However, Bhushan filed an application in the court seeking recusal of Justice Arun Mishra from hearing the contempt petition filed by Venugopal.
Bhushan also refused to tender an unconditional apology before the bench for seeking Justice Mishra's recusal.
Venugopal told the court that he stood by his earlier statement that he did not want any punishment for Bhushan in the matter.
The bench, however, said it would consider the larger issue of whether a person can criticise the court in a sub-judice matter to influence public opinion.
The bench posted the matter for further hearing on April 3.
