Live
- INS Kuthar makes maiden visit to Gopalpur Port
- PM praises city-based NGO for promoting libraries
- Odisha police rescue ‘trafficked’ Bangla girl
- iPhone 16 Plus Now at Rs. 2,000 Discount on Amazon – Get It Today
- How Technology is Shaping Global Connectivity and Enhancing Security
- Dy CM directs officials to collect all critical info on caste census
- Naga Chaitanya Opens Up About His Wedding Plans with Sobhita Dhulipala
- ‘NC24’ First Look Poster: Naga Chaitanya’s Next Promises Thrills and Mythology
- Rumors Heat Up as Vijay and Rashmika Enjoy a Cozy Meal Together
- 67th annual day celebrations held at IRISET
Udhayanidhi should talk realising he is a minister: Nirmala Sitharaman
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman
On the Sanatan Dharma row, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Saturday said DMK leader Udhayanidhi Stalin should speak realising his responsibility as a state Minister. Despite witnessing insult to Lord Rama in Tamil Nadu in 1971, Sanatan Dharma did not respond with violence, she said.
Chennai: On the Sanatan Dharma row, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Saturday said DMK leader Udhayanidhi Stalin should speak realising his responsibility as a state Minister. Despite witnessing insult to Lord Rama in Tamil Nadu in 1971, Sanatan Dharma did not respond with violence, she said.
Speaking to reporters here, the Finance Minister said if Udhayanidhi Stalin expects that there should not be any reaction to his Sanatan comments, then it is wrong. The debate on Sanatan was started by Minister Udhayanidhi, belonging to the DMK, a INDIA bloc constituent and did he initiate that debate eyeing the election (2024 Lok Sabha election)? she wondered. She was answering a question related to criticism of Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi leader Thol Thirumavalavan that the BJP was indulging in Sanatan debate considering polls. "We did not start the debate, it is you who began it." Everyone has a right and they may express their views. However, after becoming a minister a person should speak keeping in mind his responsibilities, she said.
It is wrong to use words that may incite violence or words that have connotations of violence. Ever since the nation adopted the Constitution following independence, the onus is on avoiding use of language that may instigate violence. Only whatever is needed to prevent hatred should be done. Referring to Udhayanidhi's comment that his party would talk on Sanatan Dharma for a 100 years, she said, "you may talk and only talk." No one may however indulge in violent acts and nobody should speak that could stoke violence, she asserted.
Sitharaman said she grew up in a Tamil Nadu where a garland of sandals was flung on Lord Rama's portrait and a procession was taken out. Even now, she said she had anguish about it and recalled that event now with pain. Still, it was Sanatan Dharma that did not respond with violence to even that. "That is Sanatan Dharma. We did not do anything like an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." In case some other religion had been targeted in such a manner, "you know what would have happened." The Sanatan Dharma has "described" atheists, she said, apparently hinting at space for them within the broader framework of the religion and the way of life it stood for. Hence, non-believers within the Sanatan Dharma is nothing new.
