Live
- Rythu Bharosa to pick best from PM -KISAN scheme
- Medak wears season’s festive look
- TG sets record in fine rice purchase
- Maintaining India’s growth momentum
- Study Reveals Teabags Release Billions of Microplastics and Nanoplastics, Entering Your Body
- Workplace Wonders: Creative Secret Santa Gifts for Colleagues
- Kumbh Mela 2025: Essential Guide to Comfortable and Respectful Attire for Maha Kumbh
- Hyderabad Real Estate Faces Setback: Property Sales Drop 7% Year-on-Year in 2024
- Gnani’s Gen AI Solutions Revolutionising BFSI
- Congress Party Celebrates Christmas in Gadwal District with Unity and Joy
Supreme Court allows Arun Shourie, N Ram and Prashant Bhushan to withdraw plea on contempt law
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed former Union minister Arun Shourie, journalist N Ram and activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan to withdraw their plea challenging the constitutional validity of a legal provision dealing with criminal contempt for "scandalizing the court".
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed former Union minister Arun Shourie, journalist N Ram and activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan to withdraw their plea challenging the constitutional validity of a legal provision dealing with criminal contempt for "scandalizing the court".
A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra was informed by senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, who was representing the petitioners, that they want to withdraw the plea as several petitions on the same issue are pending before the apex court and they don't want "this to be entangled" with them.
The bench, also comprising Justices B R Gavai and Krishna Murari, allowed the petition to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate judicial forum, except the apex court.
During the brief hearing conducted through video-conferencing, Dhavan said that at this stage the petitioners want to withdraw the plea with liberty to approach the top court again, maybe after two months.
The petitioners had challenged the constitutional validity of a legal provision dealing with criminal contempt, saying it was violative of freedom of speech and right to equality.
