Live
- Nagarkurnool: Students told about harmful effects of tobacco
- Unlock Exclusive Rewards with Daily Redemption Codes in Garena Free Fire MAX
- Srikakulam youth Tripurana Vijay to makes IPL debut with Delhi Capitals
- RRR oustees urge KTR for help
- Mahabubnagar: Illegal sand mining rampant
- Better amenities demanded at govt hospital
- 2,000 quintals of cotton burnt to ashes!
- France’s Total defers investment in Adani
- Hotels, mandi houses flout closing deadline right under nose of cops
- Medical mobile lab to reach out to residents
Just In
SC upholds ‘secular, socialist’ in Preamble
Scraps pleas against inclusion of the words in Constitution
New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Monday rejected at least three petitions seeking deletion of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Preamble of the Constitution of India.
The words were inserted into the Preamble in 1976 by way of 42nd amendment when the national emergency was in force.
A Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar said that the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution extends to the Preamble as well. "The writ petitions do not require detailed adjudication as the flaws and weaknesses in the arguments are obvious and manifest. Two expressions—'secular' and 'socialist' and the word 'integrity' were inserted in the Preamble vide the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976. These amendments were made in 1976. Article 368 of the Constitution permits amendment of the Constitution. The power to amend unquestionably rests with Parliament ... The date of adoption will not curtail or restrict the power under Article 368 of the Constitution. The retrospectivity argument, if accepted, would equally apply to amendments made to any part of the Constitution, though the power of the Parliament to do so under Article 368, is incontrovertible and is not challenged," the court said.
The Bench adverted to what socialism and secularism would mean in the Indian context and how the policy on the same is to be framed by the government.
"The ‘secular’ nature of the State does not prevent the elimination of attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion, when they, in the larger public interest impede development and the right to equality. In essence, the concept of secularism represents one of the facets of the right to equality, intricately woven into the basic fabric that depicts the constitutional scheme's pattern. Similarly, the word 'socialism', in the Indian context should not be interpreted as restricting the economic policies of an elected government & others of the people's choice at a given time. Neither the Constitution nor the Preamble mandates a specific economic policy or structure, whether left or right. Rather, 'socialist' denotes the State's commitment to be a welfare State and its commitment to ensuring equality of opportunity ... The word ‘socialism’ reflects the goal of economic and social upliftment and does not restrict private entrepreneurship and the right to business and trade," the court stated. The Supreme Court was hearing petitions challenging the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution of India, which added the terms "socialist" and "secular" to its the preamble of the Constitution of India. On November 22, it had indicated that it will pronounce its order in the matter on Monday. It had, at the time, reminded the petitioners that secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution and the 42nd amendment had been examined and upheld by the Supreme Court earlier as well. The petitions were filed by former Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament (MP) and BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, advocate Ashwini Upadhyay and one Balram Singh.
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com