Live
- CM Revanth Reddy to Hold Review Meeting with Senior Officials Today
- Pawan Kalyan's Visit to Penamaluru Constituency Today
- Kadapa Municipal Corporation Meeting: Heavy Police Deployment and Section 144 Imposed
- Mandhana, Renuka blow away Windies in first ODI
- Heavy rush for Bhavani Deeksha Viramana continues
- Steps taken to ensure accommodation to common devotees says TTD EO J Syamala Rao
- CRDA invites tenders for ‘Happy Nest’ township
- PD Act invoked against red sanders smuggler
- Meghalaya scrape past Goa to secure QF berth
- India lift inaugural U19 Women’s Asia Cup
SC reserves verdict on Manish Sisodia's bail pleas
The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on bail pleas filed by senior AAP leader Manish Sisodia in the liquor policy case.
New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on bail pleas filed by senior AAP leader Manish Sisodia in the liquor policy case.
A Bench presided over by Justice BR Gavai reserved its decision after hearing the oral arguments raised by Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju, representing the central agencies and senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who appeared on Sisodia’s behalf.
On Monday, the CBI and the ED told the apex court that a Rs 100 crore bribe was demanded by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) for the Goa elections, out of which Rs 45 crore has been traced in the course of the investigation.
ASG Raju submitted, “A Rs 100 crore bribe was demanded to be used for Goa elections. Out of which we have been able to trace 45 crore. We have digital evidence. There is a lot of evidence.”
He said that Sisodia was in charge of the excise department of the Delhi government and co-accused Vijay Nair was tasked to receive the kickbacks.
“They wanted to make money out of this exercise. There is evidence to show that this particular gentleman (Sisodia) engineered emails and told certain interns to write a particular type of email,” ASG Raju said.
On the other hand, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi contended that the AAP leader has been in custody for 17 months and should be granted bail on the grounds of delay in the conclusion of the trial.
Singhvi also prayed that Sisodia be released on interim bail. He said his wife has “a very very bad medical condition” and is "virtually like a vegetable."
In its judgment delivered on October 30 last year, the SC had denied bail to the former Deputy CM but said that if the trial proceeds slowly in the next three months, he may apply for bail afresh.
Special Judge Kaveri Baweja of the Rouse Avenue Court had on April 30 refused to grant bail to Sisodia who was seeking regular bail a second time. Denying bail, the trial court order noted that delays in the case proceedings were largely due to actions attributable to Sisodia himself, dismissing his claims of undue delay.
Subsequently, the Delhi High Court denied bail to Sisodia, saying that he failed to pass the triple test for grant of bail in the corruption case and the twin conditions required under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.
Challenging this, the former Deputy CM filed special leave petitions before the Supreme Court. Last month, the apex court had disposed of the pleas seeking bail in corruption and money laundering cases after Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta gave an undertaking that the final charge sheet/complaint in the liquor policy case would be filed by July 3.
Meanwhile, a court here extended the judicial custody of Sisodia, till August 9 in the CBI case and till August 13 in the money laundering case. He was produced through video conferencing from Tihar Jail upon expiry of the previously granted judicial custody.
