Live
- Tamannaah relishes Lucknow’s famous ‘Malai Makhan’ during film promotions
- Suresh Raina applauds ‘Vijay 69,’ calls it Anupam Kher’s finest performance
- Congress Clinches Landmark Victory in Shiggaavi By-Elections
- Vidhu Vinod Chopra embraces realism
- Maharashtra election result reflects people's trust in PM Modi: Chandrababu Naidu
- Maharashtra has rejected Rahul Gandhi & Congress: Tamilisai Soundararajan
- Roads blocked with containers, army called in as Pakistan seals capital Islamabad ahead of PTI protest
- ISL 2024-25: NorthEast United forward Alaaeddine Ajaraie named Player of the Month
- MahaYuti’s landslide win a major boost to make Maharashtra a $1 trillion economy
- Regional parties will continue to be future of Indian politics, says BRS
SC refuses to stay survey of Mathura's Shahi Idgah
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the Allahabad High Court's decision allowing a court-monitored survey of the Shahi Idgah...
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the Allahabad High Court's decision allowing a court-monitored survey of the Shahi Idgah adjoining the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura on an oral plea by the Muslim side and asked them to challenge the order by way of an appeal.
The high court had on Thursday allowed a court-monitored survey of the Shahi Idgah and agreed to the appointment of an advocate commissioner to oversee the survey of the mosque premises. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and SVN Bhatti deferred until January 9 the hearing on a plea filed by the Committee of Management Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah challenging the May 26 order of the high court transferring to itself all matters related to the dispute pending before a Mathura court.
"List the special leave petition on January 9. All the contentions and issues will be considered on the said date. In case petitioners have any grievance, it will be open to them to file a challenge in accordance with law," the bench ordered. The bench told senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the mosque committee, who said the high court has been considering interlocutory applications having 'far reaching ramifications' in the matter and passing orders, that the order of the high court passed on Thursday has not been formally challenged before it.
Ahmadi said the high court is entertaining application after application even as the issue of its jurisdiction to transfer to itself all matters related to the dispute is under challenge before the apex court.
Justice Khanna, while refusing to interfere with the high court order passed on Thursday said, "How can we stay the order which is not before us? You challenge the order, then we will see." Ahmadi said the high court order was uploaded on its website late Thursday evening and hence they could not file an appeal.
When Ahmadi pointed out the Supreme Court is going on a winter break from Monday and the high court may pass orders in the matter, Justice Khanna said, "Please tell the high court that this matter is listed on January 9 in the Supreme Court. That will be enough."
