Live
- Run for men’s health issues on Nov 23, 24
- Quick commerce workforce expansion to surge by 60 pc in India
- State on the brink of a public uprising over Waqf issue, says BJP
- Dr Soumya Swaminathan to talk on TB, COVID at UoH on Nov 25
- Darshan has not followed interim bail guidelines, Govt tells HC
- Parties keenly await bypoll results, spotlight on high-profile Channapatna
- 22 Central Medicine Stores to come up in TG in a week: Min Damodar Rajanarsimha
- Exit poll predictions will be proven wrong, says Dy CM
- Consumption of ganja rocks National Sanskrit University
- Air India institute to create skilled engineers for aircraft maintenance
Quota now for 7 decades, shouldn't continue for 'an indefinite period': Supreme Court
Two judges of the Supreme Court — while upholding the constitutional validity of the 103rd Constitution Amendment providing 10 per cent reservation to economically weaker sections (EWS) persons in admissions and government jobs
New Delhi: Two judges of the Supreme Court — while upholding the constitutional validity of the 103rd Constitution Amendment providing 10 per cent reservation to economically weaker sections (EWS) persons in admissions and government jobs – made some important observations on revisiting the system of reservation in the larger interest of the society, noting that it should not be allowed to become a vested interest.
A five-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice U.U. Lalit and comprising Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, S Ravindra Bhat, Bela M Trivedi and J B Pardiwala, with a 3:2 majority, upheld the EWS reservation in admissions and government jobs. Justice Trivedi and Justice Pardiwala, in separate judgments, made observations on reservation while upholding the EWS quota.
Justice Trivedi said it cannot be gainsaid that the age-old caste system in India was responsible for the origination of the reservation system in the country and it was introduced to correct the historical injustice faced by the persons belonging to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and other backward classes, and to provide them a level playing field to compete with the persons belonging to the forward classes.
"However, at the end of seventy-five years of our independence, we need to revisit the system of reservation in the larger interest of the society as a whole, as a step forward towards transformative constitutionalism," she said in her separate judgment.
Justice Pardiwala said reservation is not an end but a means – a means to secure social and economic justice. He added that reservation should not be allowed to become a vested interest and real solution, however, lies in eliminating the causes that have led to the social, educational and economic backwardness of the weaker sections of the community.
"This exercise of eliminating the causes started immediately after the Independence i.e., almost seven decades back and it still continues… As larger percentages of backward class members attain acceptable standards of education and employment, they should be removed from the backward categories so that the attention can be paid toward those classes which genuinely need help," he said in his separate judgment.
He added that it is very much necessary to take into review the method of identification and the ways of determining backward classes, and also, ascertain whether the criteria adopted or applied for the classification of backward classes is relevant for today's conditions.
"The idea of Baba Saheb Ambedkar was to bring social harmony by introducing reservation for only ten years. However, it has continued past seven decades. Reservation should not continue for an indefinite period of time so as to become a vested interest," said Justice Pardiwala.
