Live
- Japan's Yamanashi plans to raise entry fee for Mount Fuji climbers
- Convert those starts: Hemp wants Bangladesh batters to score big in second Test vs West Indies
- OpenAI signs 1st MoU in South Korea to foster AI ecosystem
- Fire breaks out during rocket test at Japan's space centre
- Nigerian military kills more suspected terrorists in Lake Chad Basin airstrikes
- NABL signs pact for on-site testing of materials in construction projects
- Cantonment MLA Sri Ganesh Advocates for New RTO Office Amid Road Expansion Concerns
- UN humanitarian chief meets Sudan's Al-Burhan to address aid crisis
- Zimbabwean president calls for international support to resolve debt issues
- Judiciary Plays a Key Role in the Indian Constitution - Senior Civil Judge A. Sri Devi
PM Modi's security breach case: SC lawyer again receives threat call, Retired Judge Indu Malhotra also warned
PM Modi's security breach case: SC lawyer again receives threat call, Retired Judge Indu Malhotra also warned
A Supreme Court lawyer once again received a threatening call warning the judges to refrain from hearing the PM Narendra Modi's security breach case.
NEW DELHI: A Supreme Court lawyer on Monday once again received a threatening call warning the judges to refrain from hearing the Prime Minister's security breach case.
"Today I once again received a threatening call on the same pattern as it was earlier received but this time the caller also took the name of Retired SC judge Justice Indu Malhotra," Supreme Court lawyer Vishnu Jain told IANS.
A bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana and comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli had constituted an inquiry committee headed by former judge Justice Malhotra to probe the PM's security breach in Punjab on January 5.
The other members on the committee are Director-General or his nominee not below the rank of Inspector General of Police of the National Investigation Agency; Director General of Police, Union Territory of Chandigarh; Additional Director General of Police (Security), State of Punjab; and Registrar General, Punjab and Haryana High Court-Member cum Coordinator.
Advocate Vishnu said that he has informed the officials of the Special Cell of the Delhi Police about this latest development.
Earlier on January 12, based on Advocate Vishnu's complaint, the Delhi Police had registered an FIR with regard to the threatening calls that were received by the lawyers of the Supreme Court.
The FIR was registered by the Special Cell of the Delhi Police under sections 153, 153-A, 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 13, 16, 18, and 20 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). On January 10, the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record (SCAORA) Association had written to the secretary-general of the Supreme Court seeking action against the anonymous callers, who took responsibility for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's security breach in Punjab.
The caller warned the top court judges to refrain from hearing the PIL seeking a probe into the security breach on the ground that the Supreme Court has not been able to punish the culprits of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
The plea had sought an independent probe into the PM's security breach in Punjab. It sought a direction to the District Judge Bathinda to collect, preserve and present all material pertaining to the movement and deployment of the Punjab Police in connection with the visit of the Prime Minister, and fix the responsibility of the DGP and the Chief Secretary of Punjab.
Earlier last week the Supreme Court had appointed a five-member committee headed by former apex court judge Indu Malhotra to probe the security breach during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to Punjab.
A bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana also appointed the Inspector General of the National Investigation Agency, Director General of Police of Chandigarh, the Registrar General of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Additional DGP (Security) of Punjab as members to the Justice Malhotra panel.
The top court directed the Registrar General of the Punjab and Haryana High Court to provide all the seized documents pertaining to the security arrangements made by the Punjab government for the PM's January 5 visit immediately to the panel head.
The bench also comprising justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli said that it was expected that the panel would file its report shortly.
On January 5, the prime minister's convoy was stranded on a flyover due to a blockade by protesters in Ferozepur after which he returned from Punjab without attending any event, including a rally.
