Live
- CM Stalin Slams BJP-Led Government Over Election Rules Amendment
- Necrophilia: Chhattisgarh HC Observes Loophole In Indian Penal Code
- Jaipur tanker blast: Vasundhara Raje meets kin of injured, follows medical protocol
- AAP-BJP Showdown Ahead Of Delhi Assembly Elections
- Can a woman make such allegations out of imagination: K'taka Minister
- SA will shine through in Champions Trophy, says Walter after 3-0 loss to Pakistan
- Trump Demands Panama Canal Return, Criticises Panama's Management and Fees
- PV Sindhu Marries Venkata Datta Sai in a Grand Ceremony in Udaipur
- Not satisfied, I want more: De Minaur sets sights on plenty of goals in 2025
- Upset over exclusion from cabinet, Bhujbal meets CM Fadnavis over 'growing' OBC resentment
Pleas seek review of same-sex marriage verdict: SC refuses open court hearing
In a setback to gay rights activists, a five judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud had on October 17 last year refused to accord legal backing to same-sex marriage
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to allow open court hearing of pleas seeking review of its last year’s judgement declining legal recognition to same-sex marriage. In a setback to gay rights activists, a five judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud had on October 17 last year refused to accord legal backing to same-sex marriage, saying there was “no unqualified right” to marriage with the exception of those that are recognised by law.
The apex court, however, had made a strong pitch for the rights of queer people so they don’t face discrimination in accessing goods and services that are available to others, safe houses known as ‘Garima Greh’ in all districts to provide shelter to members of the community facing harassment and violence and dedicated hotline numbers which they could use in case of trouble.
A five judge bench comprising the CJI and Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Hima Kohli, B V Nagarathna and P S Narasimha are scheduled to consider in chambers the pleas seeking review of the judgement on July 10. On Tuesday, senior advocates Abhishek Singhvi and NK Kaul mentioned the matter and urged the CJI to hear the review petitions in an open court. “I say that if these petitions can be heard in the open court...,” Kaul asked the court.
These are the constitution bench review matters which are listed in chambers, the CJI told him. As per the practice, the review pleas are considered in chambers by judges. In its judgement, the bench had held that transgender people in heterosexual relationships have the freedom and entitlement to marry under the existing statutory provisions. It had said an entitlement to legal recognition of the right to union, akin to marriage or civil union, or conferring legal status to the relationship can be only done through “enacted law”.
The five-judge constitution bench headed by CJI Chandrachud had delivered four separate verdicts on a batch of 21 petitions seeking legal sanction for same-sex marriages. All five judges were unanimous in refusing to accord legal recognition to same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act and observed it was within Parliament’s ambit to change the law for validating such union.
