Plea challenging travel cost to attend Parliament: Delhi HC delivers split verdict on Rashid’s plea

The Delhi High Court on Friday delivered a split verdict on the plea filed by jailed Lok Sabha member from Jammu and Kashmir’s Baramulla constituency, Engineer Abdul Rashid Sheikh, who sought modifi-cation of the conditions related to payment of travel expenses during his custody parole to attend the Parliament session.
A two-judge Bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Anup Jairam Bhambhani differed in their opinions. While Justice Chaudhary rejected Engineer Rashid’s plea, Justice Bhambhani allowed it.
The matter will now be placed before Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya, the master of the roster, for ap-propriate orders.
Rashid, who has been in Delhi’s Tihar Jail in connection with a terror funding case, had moved the High Court seeking modification of an earlier order requiring him to deposit approximately Rs 4 lakh with jail authorities towards costs incurred during his custodial visits to Parliament.
Senior advocate N Hariharan, appearing for Rashid, argued that the condition to pay daily costs effec-tively restricted the Baramulla MP from representing his constituency in Parliament.
Hariharan added that the imposition of costs, particularly the inclusion of salaries of police officials es-corting him, is not contemplated under the Delhi Prison Rules.
He further contended that while Rashid was willing to bear reasonable expenses, including the cost of meals for accompanying police officials, the inclusion of their salaries in the calculation was beyond the scope of the law.
On the other hand, counsel appearing for the Delhi Police detailed the break-up of the Rs 4 lakh amount, stating that it included the daily deployment charges, logistical costs, and security arrange-ments made for Rashid’s travel to Parliament while in custody. (IANS)



















