Live
- Google Slides Launches New Professional Templates for Enhanced Presentations
- Sarvepalli constituency will be made as role model: MLA Somireddy
- ‘Yuvatarang-24’ gets off to a colourful start at SV varsity
- Tenders to be called for flyover construction
- Israeli PM appoints new Ambassador to US
- 5-day free diabetes reversal yoga camp
- Pemmasani exhorts students to pursue entrepreneurial ventures
- Expedite road repairs, R&B minister tells officials
- Apple plans 1st-ever research subsidiary in India amid diversification push
- Union Minister Rammohan Naidu Announces Affordable Seaplane Services in AP
Just In
'It is in violation of the farmers right under PPVFR Act. The state govt shouldn't keep its eyes shut. Corporate interest cannot dictate what our farmers must or mustn't cultivate,' Patel said.
AHMEDABAD: Terming as "brazenly wrong" PepsiCo's legal action against Gujarat farmers for growing a variety of potatoes "registered" by the company, senior Congress leader Ahmed Patel Saturday said corporate interests cannot dictate what farmers must or must not cultivate.
He also said that the state government should not keep its eyes "shut" to the development.
Nine farmers from Sabarkantha and Aravalli districts of Gujarat were sued by food and beverages giant PepsiCo for allegedly growing a variety of potatoes for which it has claimed Plant Variety Protection (PVP) rights.
"Pepsi's decision to take Gujarat's potato grower farmers to court is ill-advised & brazenly wrong. It is in violation of the farmers right under PPVFR Act. The state govt shouldn't keep its eyes shut. Corporate interest cannot dictate what our farmers must or mustn't cultivate," Patel said on Twitter.
The Congress leader was referring to the Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001.
PepsiCo has said that it obtained Plant Variety Protection (PVP) rights over the potato variety under thePPVFR Act, 2001 and that the farmers were growing the potato in violation of its rights over the seed variety.
While four farmers have been sued with damage claim of Rs 1 crore each, five others have been sued with damage claim of Rs 20 lakh.
During a hearing of the case at a commercial court on Friday, PepsiCo had offered to settle the lawsuits against four potato farmers of Gujarat provided they gave an undertaking that they will not use the patented variety of potato seeds in the future.
Pepsi's decision to take Gujarat's potato grower farmers to court is ill-advised & brazenly wrong
— Ahmed Patel (@ahmedpatel) April 27, 2019
It is in violation of the farmers right under PPVFR Act
The state govt shouldn't keep its eyes shut
Corporate interest cannot dictate what our farmers must or mustn't cultivate
Activists in Gujarat have objected to PepsiCo's action and even threatened the company of consequences if it did not withdraw the case, arguing that farmers are protected to use PVP protected seed varieties under the PPVFR Act.
Over 190 activists Wednesday requested the Union government to ask PepsiCo India to withdraw its "false" cases against Gujarat farmers for allegedly illegally growing a variety of potatoes "registered" by the company.
In a statement, PepsiCo said on Friday that it was "compelled" to take the legal path to safeguard the interests of farmers associated with its "collaborative potato farming programme".
© 2024 Hyderabad Media House Limited/The Hans India. All rights reserved. Powered by hocalwire.com