Live
- Branded hotels in India to clock double-digit growth in FY25, FY26: Crisil
- Nitish Kumar's strategic moves reshape Bihar's politics in 2024
- Over 68 hours on, 3-year-old still stuck in borewell; rat miners roped in
- Father, two kids die as cars collide in TN's Chengalpattu
- Karnataka CM pays last respects to soldiers killed in J&K accident, assures support to kin
- BJP MLA Munirathna Egged During Public Event In Bengaluru
- Get the iPhone 16 at a Massive Discount of Rs 16000 - Today Only
- CPI Secretary Narayana Calls for Reforms in Film Industry, Urges Government to Prioritize Social Responsibility in Cinema
- We reject Kasturirangan report, will go by people’s needs and rights: Khandre
- Former MLA was ready to marry ‘fraudster’ Shweta Gowda
New Delhi: Kalita moves HC seeking videos of anti-CAA protests
Kalita pleads that she needs the videos and chats to prove her innocence, but the Delhi Police counsel contends that her petitions are not maintainable
New Delhi : Delhi riots accused Devangana Kalita on Thursday approached the high court here seeking direction to the police to provide her certain videos and WhatsApp chats in two cases, including one under anti-terror law UAPA, related to the communal violence during the 2020 protests against the CAA and NRC.
The Delhi High Court issued notice on the petitions by the student activist and asked the investigating agency to file its response, but refused to stay the trial court proceedings in the meantime. Kalita pleaded that she needed the videos and chats to prove her innocence, but the Delhi Police counsel contended that her petitions were not maintainable.
He said further investigation was still underway in the cases and material being sought by the petitioner was not part of the charge sheet. Justice Amit Bansal listed the case for further hearing on January 17 and said, “There is no question of stay till I hear both sides”.
Kalita’s counsel submitted that the Delhi Police had commissioned certain persons to record the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act and National Register of Citizens in February 2020 and the footage should be supplied to her before the trial court proceeds to hear the arguments on the framing of charges.
“Those videos will demonstrate that from February 22 to 26 (of 2020), we were protesting peacefully. The videos will demonstrate that.. I want to exercise my valuable right of discharge (in the criminal cases),” he said.
“The case against me (in one of the FIRs in the present matter) is murder. I am said to be part of a group of protestors under the Jafrabad flyover. Selective screengrabs have been taken... The videos exist. I say it is exculpatory. Provide me the videos,” Kalita’s lawyer
contended. Besides the video footage, the lawyer also sought the “entire WhatsApp chat” of a group, “selective extracts” of which were allegedly being used against the petitioner.
