Live
- Trump Cabinet 2.0: Complete List of Key Appointments, Featuring Musk, Ramaswamy, and Ratcliffe
- Don’t get taken for a ride by Congress: Bandi to Maha voters
- Cyberabad police holds coordination meet with pvt security agencies
- Colourful procession taken out from Gurudwara Guru Singh Sabha
- Parl Standing Committee on Defence visits DRDL
- HYDRA Comm visits Bathukamma Kunta in Amberpet
- Old City families on edge over tepid pace of survey
- Janhvi Kapoor reveals why she is having ‘travel anxiety’
- Malaika is ‘working on something special’: Going to be an ode to my father
- Nagarkurnool MP calls on Defence Minister
Murder trial to continue against Jagdish Tytler: HC
Tytler says there was no credible evidence to corroborate the allegations against him and the trial court’s order was “misconceived” passed “mechanically” and liable to be set aside
New Delhi : The Delhi High Court on Monday made it clear that the murder trial in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler would continue.
Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri was hearing a plea filed by Tytler seeking a stay on the trial proceedings taking place against him in a Delhi court. The court would continue with the hearing on November 29. “It is made clear the trial will continue. Same will be subject to the outcome of the present proceedings,” the judge ordered.
Tytler’s counsel submitted the case was listed for the recording of evidence of a prosecution witness before the trial court on November 12 and the trial court was asked to not proceed till the high court decided his plea against the framing of charges order. Tytler’s plea challenging the framing of murder and other charges against him is listed on November 29 but he moved court with the plea to stay the trial.
His plea said the evidence of the prosecution witness was recorded by the trial court and her cross-examination by the defence counsel was scheduled for November 12. “The criminal revision petition (of Tytler) raised substantial questions upon the motivation of the prosecution and the investigation conducted by the CBI.
Therefore, an order/direction from this court for the trial court to not proceed with the captioned matter till the pendency of the revision petition is expedient in the interest of justice,” his plea read. Senior advocate H S Phoolka, representing the victims, opposed the plea arguing the witness was old and suffered from various ailments and being subjected to multiple court appearances. She would be appearing in court for the fourth time, he said. Tytler has claimed being a victim of a “witch-hunt” and contended the trial court’s order framing charges against him was “perverse, illegal and lacked application of mind”. “Trial court has erroneously framed charges against the petitioner overlooking the settled principles of law on the point of charge,” his petition stated. While Tytler’s counsel raised the alibi’s plea, claiming his absence at the time of the incident, the counsel for the CBI and victims argued the plea of alibi had already been decided and rejected by the high court.
Tytler said there was no credible evidence to corroborate the allegations against him and the trial court’s order was “misconceived” passed “mechanically” and liable to be set aside. He alleged it was a case of harassment wherein he was made to face the trial for alleged crimes committed more than four decades ago, and referred to being 80-years old and suffering from several ailments, including heart disease and diabetes. The trial court on September 13 framed charges against him after he pleaded not guilty.
