Live
- Mohan Babu’s look as Mahadeva Shastri from ‘Kannappa’ grabs attention
- A soulful song from ‘Bachhala Malli’ gets unveiled
- ‘Pushpa-2: The Rule’ creates nationwide buzz with electrifying updates
- CERT-In Warns iPhone Users: Update to iOS 18.1.1 Now to Avoid Hacking
- Rana Daggubati’s Show gets huge applause at 55th IFFI
- Jana Sena MLA Pulaparthi Ramanjaneyulu Elected as PAC chairman
- Stage set for counting of votes for Jharkhand Assembly elections
- MLA Sri Ganesh Engages ASHA Workers and Resource Persons in Caste Census Meeting
- Supreme Court verdict on validity of Preamble modification in 1976 likely on November 25
- ‘Zebra’ movie review: A gripping tale of banking fraud and redemption
Make adultery crime again
Parl panel contradicts SC order
New Delhi: Adultery should be made a crime again because "the institution of marriage is sacred" and it must be "protected", a parliamentary panel recommended to the Union government on Tuesday in its report on the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, a bill tabled by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in September. The report has also argued that the revised adultery law must treat it as a "gender-neutral" crime and has called for both parties - the man and the woman - to be held equally liable. The panel's report, if accepted by the government, is set to contradict a landmark 2018 ruling by a five-member bench of the Supreme Court that said: "Adultery cannot and should not be a crime". The Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita is part of a set of three that is supposed to replace the Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Indian Evidence Act. It had been sent in August to the Standing Committee on Home Affairs, which is headed by BJP MP Brij Lal, for further scrutiny.
Congress MP P Chidambaram was among those who submitted dissent notes; “... the state has no business to enter into the lives of a couple,” he said as he raised three “fundamental objections” that included claims that all three bills are “largely a copy and paste of the existing laws”. In 2018, a Supreme Court bench led by the Chief Justice Dipak Misra said adultery “can be a ground for a civil offence... for divorce...” but could not be a criminal offence. The court reasoned that the 163-year-old, colonial-era law followed the invalidated concept of “husband is master of the wife”.
In scathing comments, the court called the law “archaic”, “arbitrary” and “paternalistic”, and said it infringed on a woman’s autonomy and dignity. The government’s attempt at overhauling the IPC, the CrPC and the Evidence Act are part of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s oft-repeated statement about freeing India from colonial-era laws. In September this year and in October last year the PM spoke about the need for “contemporary laws”.
Before the 2018 verdict, the law said a man who had sex with a married woman - without her husband’s consent - could face a five-year sentence if convicted. The woman would not be punished.
