Live
- WhatsApp Update: WhatsApp Rolls Out Group Mentions in Status Updates
- Chandrababu Advocates for Balanced Governance and Development in Andhra Pradesh
- Our 6 free services in Delhi pinching rivals: Kejriwal at 'Revadi par Charcha' campaign
- Abu Dhabi T10: Jos Buttler shines in debut, lauds England batters after memorable performances
- BCCI releases dates for IPL 2025 to 2027
- Centre releases Rs 448 crore as grant for rural local bodies in Karnataka
- India and Japan bolster defence ties, explore air domain cooperation
- Masik Shivratri 2024: Date, Time, Rituals, and Significance
- 8 of 10 Indian stockbrokers to increase IT budgets for emerging tech adoption
- Utpanna Ekadashi 2024: Date, Rituals, and Significance
Delhi High Court To Review Manish Sisodia's Bail Plea Amidst Corruption Allegations
- Get the latest updates on legal proceedings involving Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders in Delhi.
- The Delhi High Court is set to examine Manish Sisodia's bail plea amidst corruption allegations, while the Supreme Court delays its decision on Arvind Kejriwal's bail, raising concerns over governmental stability.
According to PTI, the Delhi High Court is scheduled to review the bail request of Manish Sisodia, a prominent figure in the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi, in connection with corruption and money laundering charges related to an alleged excise policy scam.
Sisodia was initially apprehended by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in February 2023 and subsequently by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in March of the same year. The ED's chargesheet identified Sisodia as a "key conspirator" in the case, prompting his resignation from the Delhi cabinet on February 28, 2023.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has postponed its decision on Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's temporary bail petition. The court is expected to address the matter in two days. Earlier discussions emphasized the potential ramifications of granting interim bail to Kejriwal, stating that it could disrupt the government's operations. The court underscored the importance of maintaining propriety and avoiding interference with governmental functions, indicating that it is currently focused on matters of propriety rather than legality.
