Allahabad High Court asks government to respond on plea against ASI survey in Varanasi
Allahabad High Court (File/Photo)
The Allahabad High Court has directed the Centre and the state government to file their respective responses to a petition challenging a Varanasi court's order which directed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to conduct a comprehensive survey of the Kashi Vishwanath Temple (KVT)-Gyanvapi Mosque complex in order to find out whether a temple was demolished to build the mosque that stands adjacent to the KVT
Prayagraj (Uttar Pradesh): The Allahabad High Court has directed the Centre and the state government to file their respective responses to a petition challenging a Varanasi court's order which directed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to conduct a comprehensive survey of the Kashi Vishwanath Temple (KVT)-Gyanvapi Mosque complex in order to find out whether a temple was demolished to build the mosque that stands adjacent to the KVT.
Justice Prakash Padia, on Wednesday, issued the directions on a petition filed by UP Sunni Central Waqf Board and Anjuman Intazamia Masjid, Varanasi.
The case will come up for hearing on September 29.
Appearing for one of the petitioners, senior advocate S.F.A. Naqvi contended that the suit, by which the order of the civil judge (senior division), fast-track court (FTC) of Varanasi (dated April 8, 2021) is under challenge, is itself not maintainable under Section 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, as it bars filing of suit or any other legal proceedings with respect to conversion of religious character of any place of worship, existing on August 15, 1947.
He contended that no claim can be made regarding a religious place which existed on August 15, 1947.
As per the Act of 1991, no relief can be sought for changing the status of any religious place as it existed on August 15, 1947, he argued and added that the order for conducting the survey is illegal.
The petitioner's counsel further contended that when the high court has already reserved its judgment on the issue of maintainability of the aforesaid suit, the court below should not have passed any order in the suit till the issue of maintainability of the suit was decided by the high court.
