Live
- All you need to know about PAN 2.0
- Akasa Air redefines travel experience with industry-first offerings
- MP: Residents stage protests against liquor shop in Indore
- Telugu Actor Shri Tej Booked for Alleged Cheating and False Promise of Marriage in Live-in Relationship
- Toyota Kirloskar Motor Celebrates 1 Lakh Urban Cruiser Hyryder on Indian Road
- MLS: New York City FC part ways with head coach Nick Cushing
- Delhi CM says Centre cutting AAP voters’ names from rolls, BJP hits back
- Hyderabad Metro Rail Phase-II Works to Begin in Old City in January 2025
- Odisha: 668 persons killed in human-elephant conflicts in last three years
- DEFENDER JOURNEYS: TO EMBARK ON ITS THIRD EDITION FROM NOVEMBER 2024
Vijayawada: High Court grants anticipatory bail to Chandrababu Naidu in 3 cases
N Chandrababu Naidu
- 1. Justice T Mallikarjun Rao pronounces orders on petitions filed by former CM in Amaravati Inner Ring Road, liquor and free sand policy cases
- 2. Court asks him not to make any comments that can influence the probe
- 3. Former minister Kollu Ravindra and retired IAS officer Srinaresh have also been granted anticipatory bail in the liquor case
Vijayawada : Andhra Pradesh High Court on Wednesday granted anticipatory bail in three cases to TDP national president N Chandrababu Naidu. Judge T Mallikarjun Rao pronounced the orders on bail petitions of the former chief minister in Amaravati Inner Ring Road, sand and liquor cases.
The court directed him to refrain from making any comments that could influence the investigation. Former minister Kollu Ravindra and retired IAS officer Srinaresh were also granted anticipatory bail in the liquor case.
The CID had registered these cases against Naidu following his arrest in the Andhra Pradesh Skill Development Corporation case in September 9 last year. After spending 52 days in jail, Naidu had walked out of jail on October 31 after the High Court had granted him bail.
While he was in jail, the CID had registered two cases against him for alleged irregularities in construction of Amaravati Inner Ring Road and for allegedly favouring some liquor companies when he was the Chief Minister from 2014 to 2019.
The TDP chief had filed three separate petitions in the High Court seeking anticipatory bail. The judgments in all the three were reserved on different dates.
In the Skill Development Corporation case, there were allegations against Naidu and others that they caused a loss of Rs 300 crore to the state exchequer in the name of setting up skill development centres.
Two days later, the CID booked a case against Naidu in the Amaravati Inner Ring Road case. The liquor case was registered a couple of days before Naidu was granted bail and released from jail.
Following a complaint by Andhra Pradesh State Beverages Corporation Limited (APSBCL) MD D Vasudeva Reddy, the CID had registered the case against Naidu, then Excise Minister Kollu Ravinda, and then Excise Commissioner Srinaresh.
The CID alleged that the decisions taken by them, without following due process and business rules, caused a loss to the tune of Rs 1,500 crore to the exchequer. It charged them of causing pecuniary gain to retail and bar license holders as well as some companies which supplied liquor to the APSBCL.
The CID on November 2 registered another case against Naidu regarding free sand policy. Former mines and geology minister Peethala Sujatha, former MLAs Chintamaneni Prabhakar and Devineni Uma Maheswara Rao were also booked.
It is alleged that Naidu, his then Cabinet colleague and MLAs from the specific sand reach areas and others significantly benefited out of the free sand policy.
The CID stated in its FIR that the free sand policy was implemented by the then government without following due procedures. Naidu, in his anticipatory bail petitions, had argued that the cases were registered as part of the political vendetta unleashed by the ruling dispensation with an aim to keep him in jail till the elections.
