Live
- 4th T20I: India elect to bat first in series decider vs South Africa
- The Telangana Woman Sushma Thodety Shines in the UMB Pageant's ‘Mrs. India’ Competition
- Suspect arrested after firing shots near Israeli consulate in Istanbul
- IPL 2025: Pant, Iyer, Rahul, Buttler, Shami among most-priced as 571 players set for mega auction
- Delhi Mayor poll: Cross-voting shows AAP councillors’ frustration, says Congress leader Jitender Kochar
- NIA files fresh charges against Mizoram-based arms trafficker
- From appeasement to 'New India' pitch: Nadda credits PM Modi for changing style of politics
- Bihar liquor ban gave rise to unauthorised trade, means ‘big money’ for officials: Patna HC
- COP29 Presidency launches initiative to address climate change, humanitarian needs
- Bangladesh's October foreign reserves fall below 20 billion USD
Gautam Sawang not fit to continue as APPSC chairman: Pattabhi
Pattabhi demands the resignation of Sawang before the Governor removes him
Amaravati : Following the AP High Court’s call to cancel the Group-1 Mains examination conducted in APPSC 2018, the opposition is fuming over multiple evaluation of answer sheets. TDP national spokesperson Kommareddy Pattabhiram held a media conference in this order.
He said that it has been clarified that Gautam Sawang is not qualified to continue as APPSC chairman. Coming with the evidence we have, is Sawang ready to discuss in front of the media, Pattabhi challenged. Pattabhi demanded the resignation of Sawang before the Governor removed him.
Pattabhi criticised that there is also evidence that manual evaluation was done between December 2021 and February 2022 in connection with the Group-1 examination and after the evaluation the Court was also tried to be misled. It is alleged that he gave false affidavit to the Court twice that the manual evaluation was done only after March 25, 2022.
Pattabhi questioned how they will do the second time after the evaluation is done once. It was revealed that Sitharamanjane had written the letter asking for a second evaluation. It was explained that the Courts were told that the second evaluation was not done.
Shall we call 30 policemen who came from Kurnool for security Gautam Sawang, he challenged. He deposed that if the evaluation was not done, why the police was sent.
