- Abbott Encourages More People to Talk About Menopause, The Next Chapter in a Woman's Life
- US pharma start-up to manufacture artificial retina in space
- BJP opposes Nawab Malik’s entry to Ajit Pawar-led breakaway NCP
- Margashirsha Amavasya 2023: Date, Timing And Rituals To Be Followed
- Armed Forces Flag Day 2023: History, celebrations and how to contribute
- SAT sets aside SEBI order restraining IIFL Securities from taking new clients
- PL Stock Report: NOCIL (NOCIL IN) - Company Update – Near term challenges persist - Downgrade to 'Reduce'
- International Civil Aviation Day 2023: Date, theme, history and meaning
- Richa & Ali’s ‘Girls will be Girls’ to Premiere at Sundance 2024!
- From Karan Kundrra to Tinna Datta, Munawar Faruqui receives star-studded support in Bigg Boss 17
Prof. Sanjay Kumar Pandey speaks on Russia-Ukraine conflict
Prof. Sanjay Kumar Pandey from the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University visited the Department of Political Science, University of Hyderabad and delivered a lecture titled ‘Russia-Ukraine war and its implications’.
Prof. Sanjay Kumar Pandey from the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University visited the Department of Political Science, University of Hyderabad and delivered a lecture titled 'Russia-Ukraine war and its implications'.
Prof Pandey commenced his lecture citing studies by American scholars who predicted the Russia-Ukraine war back in the late 1990s as NATO attempted to expand its membership in the post-Cold War period. He underlined that Putin had, in several international platforms, raised Russia's serious concerns over the West's interference in other nations in the name of human rights protection and democracy promotion. The short war with Georgia of 2008 in which Russia liberated the rebelling territories within Georgia and announced them as independent Republics should have alerted the West to not expand NATO, to the East. Putin even wanted Ukraine to be part of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO) and the Eurasian Economic Council. However, the Ukrainian leadership stopped the negotiations and warmed up to the West which led to the escalation of the conflict before the current war broke out. Months before the start of the war, Putin wrote a lengthy article where he claimed the unity of Russian and Ukrainian people and rejected any claims of distinct identity to the Ukrainian people. Seen against this context, Prof Pandey opined that the Ukrainians' desire to rebel against the imposed uniformity is not out of animosity for the Russians but for the sake of protecting their distinct identity.
According to Prof Sanjay Pandey, the differences that exist between the two countries can be traced to their perceptions of their place with regards to each other and their common history. The same historical phenomenon can be interpreted differently by different people. While the Russians perceive the Pereiaslav Agreement as a consensual treaty to join the Tsarist Russia, Ukrainians perceive it as one to which they were arm-twisted to agree.
Prof. Pandey also spoke about the socio-historical context in which the war has broken out. Huntington calls Russia a 'torn country' with no Reformist milestones like the Glorious Revolution, the French revolution or the renaissance which served as pre-conditions for democracy in Europe. In the current context, the popularity of Putin and the emergence of Russia as an energy super power give an opportunity to Russia to extend the war. He further pointed out that the involvement of Wagner group in the current conflict—a private paramilitary organisation with more than 80% of recruits from prisons—the war is getting complex every other day.
The lecture was followed by a question answer session wherein students raised issues like leadership, civil-military relations, Russian election processes and so on. The lecture was presided over by Prof Kham Khan Suan Hausing, the Head of the Department. Dr S Shaji, faculty member, moderated the lecture and the discussion.