Live
- Sunny Leone's Name Used in Fraud Under Chhattisgarh’s Mahtari Vandan Yojana
- Gold Business Fraud Uncovered in Atmakur, Wanaparthy
- Rachakonda Police Seize Rs.88 Crore Worth Drugs, Arrest 521 Accused
- Sriram Krishnan Appointed Senior Policy Advisor for AI at the White House
- Cyclone alert at seven ports in Tamil Nadu; rain, strong winds expected
- Uttarakhand CM to attend MP govt's 'Jan Kalyan Parv' in Sagar today
- Sri Jagdamba Pearls Expands Presence with the launch of its Second Store in Bengaluru at Lulu Mall
- Congress remembers Dalits only in bad times: Mayawati taunts Rahul Gandhi on Parbhani visit
- Have time for jailed leaders but none for achievers: BJP slams Delhi govt over chess champion’s pain
- Alliance University holds 13th Convocation, 1145 students receive degrees
Tata-Mistry Verdict Supreme Court stays NCLAT order on RoC plea for changes
In a major development in the Tata Sons-Cyrus Mistry row, the Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) order dismissing the Registrar of Company's (RoC) plea to modify its verdict on the Tata Sons matter.
New Delhi: In a major development in the Tata Sons-Cyrus Mistry row, the Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) order dismissing the Registrar of Company's (RoC) plea to modify its verdict on the Tata Sons matter.
Tata Sons had challenged in the apex court the NCLAT's January 6 order on conversion of Tata Sons from a public to a private company.
Agreeing to hear the Tata Sons' plea, the apex court on Friday issued a notice to the parties concerned. The three judge bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde will hear the matter along with the main plea filed by Tata Sons against NCLAT's verdict.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) had on January 6 rejected the plea by the RoC to modify the appellate tribunal's judgement in the Tata-Mistry case.
The NCLAT had in its December 18 verdict termed the RoC's decision to allow conversion of Tata Sons from a public to private company as illegal, while the RoC had filed a plea at the appellate tribunal to remove the word "illegal" from its verdict, among other observations.
