Live
- Sandhya Theater Stampede Incident: Rahul Ramakrishna Retracts Comments on Issue
- Garena Free Fire MAX Redeem Codes for December 2024: Unlock Skins, Weapons, and More
- Dr. Ponguleti Sudhakar Reddy Welcomes Union Minister Piyush Goyal in Bengaluru
- Why Christmas is Celebrated on December 25: The Link to Roman Festivals
- Tributes paid to G Venkataswamy (Kaka)
- Amit Shah should quit; demand MP, MLA
- Hike in support price brings cheer to coconut farmers
- Apple's Face ID Smart Doorbell Could Unlock Doors by Late 2025
- Amit Shah must tender apology
- Govt’s focus on rural and tribal health: Minister Damodar
SC asks BJP UP spokesperson to tender apology
The apex court modified the condition imposed by the high court which said that Umrao shall report before the police daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm for a period of 15 days
New Delhi: The Supreme Court said on Thursday a lawyer accused of spreading false information about attacks on migrant labourers from Bihar in Tamil Nadu should be "more responsible" and asked him to tender an apology.
A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Pankaj Mithal was hearing two separate pleas filed by advocate Prashant Kumar Umrao, whose verified Twitter handle says he is a spokesperson for Uttar Pradesh BJP, including the one challenging a condition imposed on him by the Madras High Court while granting anticipatory bail in the case.
The apex court modified the condition imposed by the high court which said that Umrao shall report before the police daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm for a period of 15 days and, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
The top court directed that the petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer on April 10 and after that as and when the IO requires his presence. "What is his standing at the bar?" the bench asked senior advocate Sidharth Luthra, who was appearing for the petitioner. When Luthra said seven years, the bench observed, "He (petitioner) should be more responsible". "Before the next date, you tender an apology," the bench said.
The apex court also passed an ad-interim order saying the anticipatory bail granted to him by the high court will be applicable in any other FIRs registered in Tamil Nadu with regard to the tweet.
Luthra said the petitioner has filed two petitions including one against the condition imposed by the high court while granting anticipatory bail and the other seeking clubbing of FIRs lodged against him at different police stations over the tweet, which he later deleted.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the state, said there was no other FIR in which Umrao has been named. An FIR was lodged against Umrao under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including those for provocation with intent to cause riot, promoting enmity and hatred, provoking breach of peace and statement leading to public mischief, the police had said.
