Live
- 2024 on track to be hottest year on record
- PM Modi’s visit to Solapur: Women applaud ‘Double-Engine’ government’s initiatives
- Nagarkurnool MLA Dr. Kuchukulla Rajesh Reddy Campaigning in Maharashtra Elections
- Wife Kills Husband with Her Lover: Details of Veldanda Murder Case Revealed by SP Gaikwad
- Strict Action on Violations of Food Rights: Telangana Food Commission Chairman Goli Srinivas Reddy
- Smooth Conduct of Group-3 Exams with Strict Security Measures: Collector Badavath Santosh
- Delhi HC orders cancellation of LOC issued against Ashneer Grover, wife
- Shami’s absence a major blow for India in BGT, says Paul Adams
- Will organize protests at borders if attack on minority Hindus in Bangladesh not stopped: Bengal LoP
- Dutch Ambassador Marisa Gerard Meets Telangana CM A. Revanth Reddy in Delhi
Suspense continues over disqualification of YSRCP rebel MLAs, speaker likely to take a decision
The suspense over the potential disqualification of YSRCP MLAs continues as Speaker Tammineni Sitaram is expected to make a decision today. Yesterday,...
The suspense over the potential disqualification of YSRCP MLAs continues as Speaker Tammineni Sitaram is expected to make a decision today. Yesterday, the Speaker conducted an inquiry on the disqualification petition of 8 MLAs, with five MLAs attending a personal hearing. The Speaker askysrved them to explain why no action should be taken under the Anti-Defection Act. Their request for four weeks to provide an explanation was rejected by the Speaker, who reminded them that they had already been given three extensions.
TDP MLA Vasupalli Ganesh, who had complained to the Speaker, also attended the hearing. However, MLAs Mekapati Chandrasekhar Reddy, Anam Ramanarayana Reddy, Kotam Reddy Sridhar Reddy, Undavalli Sridevi, and MLC C. Ramachandraiah, who defected to the Telugu Desam Party, faced a setback in the High Court. The court refused to stay the investigation of the Speaker and the Chairman of the Council regarding the disqualification petitions filed against them.
The court also rejected their request for an interim order to provide them with four weeks to explain the notices from the Speaker and Chairman. The case has been adjourned to February 26, and all parties involved have been ordered to file counters with full details.
